Computer Science > Information Theory
[Submitted on 23 Nov 2012 (v1), revised 4 Apr 2013 (this version, v2), latest version 11 Nov 2013 (v3)]
Title:The MDS Queue: Analysing Latency Performance of Codes and Redundant Requests
View PDFAbstract:It is well known that Maximum-Distance-Separable (MDS) codes, such as Reed-Solomon codes, provide the maximum storage efficiency in distributed storage systems. While the use of codes for providing improved reliability in archival storage systems, where the data is less frequently accessed, is well understood, the role of codes in the storage of more frequently accessed 'hot data', where latency is the key metric, is less clear. In this paper, we study storage systems based on MDS codes through the lens of queueing theory, and term this the "MDS queue." We analytically characterize its latency performance, for which we present insightful scheduling policies that form upper and lower bounds to performance. Extensive simulations are also provided and used to validate our theoretical analysis. Comparisons with replication-based systems reveal that codes provide a superior latency-performance (by up to 70%) than replication.
The second part of the paper considers an alternative method of reducing latency in data centers, that of sending "redundant requests". Here, a request is sent to more servers than required, and is deemed served when any requisite number of servers complete service. Several recent works provide empirical evidence of the benefits of redundant requests in various settings, and in this paper, we aim to analytically characterize the situations when can redundant requests actually help. We show that under the MDS queue model (with exponential service times and negligible costs of cancelling jobs), in a replication-based system, the average latency strictly reduces with more redundancy in the requests, and that under a general MDS code, the average latency is minimized when requests are sent to all servers. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first analytical results that prove the benefits of sending redundant requests.
Submission history
From: Nihar Shah [view email][v1] Fri, 23 Nov 2012 02:16:02 UTC (1,086 KB)
[v2] Thu, 4 Apr 2013 15:41:08 UTC (1,216 KB)
[v3] Mon, 11 Nov 2013 01:44:19 UTC (2,607 KB)
Current browse context:
cs.IT
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.